



They are collegiate. There are other collegiate universities – Durham, for example – but in Oxford and Cambridge the colleges are independent institutions but also part of the university. You, as a student, are really a member of a college first, and the university second. The courses that you follow, however, are all set by the university and are the same which ever college you attend.
The system for application and selection is peculiar to these universities.
The system by which you are taught is unique to these universities. You will be allocated a tutor (or supervisor in Cambridge) who will oversee your education. You will meet with your supervisor, on your own or perhaps with another student, weekly or fortnightly, and the purpose is to discuss your work and progress and to agree tasks for the future. These meeting are lengthy and intense. You will not enjoy this system unless you have been self motivated enough to do the preparatory work and you enjoy serious academic and intellectual debate – again, this not for everyone!
In the sciences, there will be a considerable amount of other lectures, seminars and practicals, but in arts and humanities much less is on offer and is not compulsory. In essence, you are expected to take responsibility for your own learning and progress. The staff of the universities are there mainly to carry out academic research, not to teach you. Again, this will not suit everyone, only the most intellectually curious and self motivated.
The terms are very short – only eight weeks – but are very intense. You may not have many lectures but you are expected to work very hard. Tutorials can be very embarrassing for those who have done little work; there are few, if any other student there and there is nowhere to hide! Successful students also tend to be the most organised.
Most universities have or are moving to modular degree courses, with tests during each year – but not Oxbridge, who still rely on end of year exams, usually in years two and three.
For Oxford, we have a piece of software called The Oxford University Challenge that has been produced by students currently at Oxford. This can be very useful in finding out the ‘Oxford insiders’ view of the colleges. Look in the Careers section of the school intranet.
There is a similar one for Cambridge – The Cambridge Admissions Guide.
The first point to make is that you don’t have to choose a college - you can make an OPEN application. Using this system, you apply to the university and their computer will allocate you to a college that has had fewer applicants in that year. Every admissions tutor I have talked to insists that open applicants have just as much chance of a successful application as do those who apply direct to a college – and my experience is that this is the case. But you must be prepared to accept whatever college you are allocated, and for girls this may be an all-girls college, which always have fewer applicants.
Many, then, prefer to apply to a college. So how do you choose one.
BUT, while you may apply to a college, there is no guarantee that this is where you will end up if your application is successful. 20% of applicants are accepted by a college that is different to the one to which they originally applied. This is because the college may recognise their intellectual potential but cannot offer them a place for this year, so they are offered to other colleges.
It is possible that you may be offered a place for the following year.
The best advice that I can offer is to visit. There are open days – go and look around, talk to admissions staff and to current students. I usually organise a visit to Oxford in late June, early July, when there are Science department and most college open days. If you want to go it is up to you to contact the college(s) of your choice to book open day visits and overnight accommodation; I merely provide the transport.
If you are serious about making an application – and all our experience suggests that you are much less likely to succeed if you are not serious – you should :
Be wary of any statistics. The information is useful, but you should not base decisions solely on "which is the best college?" or "which takes the most independent school applicants?" Such statistics hide the fact that "the best course" may not actually be the one that suits you, or that "the best college" could be the hardest to get into. Your research, whilst taking these statistics into account, should range much wide
These tables are produced unofficially to attempt to rank Oxford and Cambridge colleges according to the quality of their degree results. Those colleges that appear at the top of the tables are those that have the highest proportion high quality degrees. The implication is that the colleges at the top are the ones that are most concerned to preserve their academic reputation and are therefore the most competitive.
This paragraph from the Oxford University Students' Union website puts the tables into context:
"The Norrington Table lists all the Oxford colleges according to the performance in Finals of their students. Published every summer, it receives disproportionate media interest, given that the difference between the first and 30th-ranked colleges is little more than a few firsts here and there. All the same, colleges seem to put great store by the Norrington, and have been known to try various schemes to raise their position in the Table - Catz tried to limit bar opening hours, Trinity turned up the pressure on Finalists, and many colleges in the past have rusticated or sent down students as a deterrent to slackers." |
Oxford have recently produced their own academic league table.
To link to a site that has an up-to-date Norrington table as well as Oxfords official tables, go to http://www.fantasyfacup.com/matthew/fun/norrington
To view the Cambridge Tompkins table, go to http://www.fantasyfacup.com/matthew/fun/tompkins/